Palmer v Inspire Support Services Tas Pty Ltd

Palmer v Inspire Support Services Tas Pty Ltd

[2026] FWC 1615
Published 11 May 2026

The Facts An administration and rostering officer at a Tasmanian disability support provider emailed her employer proposing she stop working as a permanent employee and instead support some clients independently, while remaining open to casual shifts. The employer treated her emails as a resignation, cut her system access, removed her shifts and stopped communicating with her. The employer then failed to participate in the Commission proceedings at all, despite numerous attempts to make contact. The Decision The Commissioner found the…

The rest of this case is for HR Automate members

Sign in to read the full analysis, employer takeaways, and related policy templates.

Sign in Or learn about membership
Important — for information only. This case summary is general background information and should not be relied on as legal or HR advice. Summaries can miss important legal detail and every situation has its own facts. Before taking any action based on what you read here, get independent advice from a qualified employment lawyer or HR professional.
By browsing this website, you agree to our privacy policy.
I Agree