Venville v Department of Justice and Community Safety
[2026] FWCFB 124
The Facts Mr Venville was dismissed and later lodged a general protections application about a month after the 21-day statutory deadline. He sought an extension of time, citing health issues including depression, anxiety and Klinefelter syndrome, as well as financial hardship and lack of awareness of the time limit. The Decision The Commissioner at first instance refused the extension, finding no 'exceptional circumstances' to justify the late filing. On appeal, the Full Bench refused permission to appeal, holding the Commissioner…
The rest of this case is for HR Automate members
Sign in to read the full analysis, employer takeaways, and related policy templates.
Sign in Or learn about membership
Important — for information only. This case summary is general background information and should not be relied on as legal or HR advice. Summaries can miss important legal detail and every situation has its own facts. Before taking any action based on what you read here, get independent advice from a qualified employment lawyer or HR professional.